精东传媒

Large crowd of protesters in West Papua. Picture: Frans/EPA
Picture: Frans/EPA
Large crowd of protesters in West Papua. Picture: Frans/EPA
Picture: Frans/EPA

Riots in West Papua: why Indonesia needs to answer for its broken promises

Riots in West Papua: why Indonesia needs to answer for its broken promises

Political arrests have been on the rise in recent years in restive West Papua, and the local population is pushing for a new referendum on independence

Last weekend, the into custody for allegedly disrespecting the Indonesian flag during an independence day celebration (an allegation the students deny).

Police stormed the students鈥 dorm and used teargas to force them out, while bystanders and officers called them 鈥溾, a derogatory term for ethnically Melanesian Papuans.

West Papuans have long been cast by Indonesians as primitive people from the Stone Age, and this racist treatment continues to this day. West Papuan author Filep Karma described the extent of racism against West Papuans in his 2014 book, , saying he often heard Indonesians call West Papuans monkeys.

This latest episode of discrimination builds on of racism, torture, summary executions, land dispossession and cultural denigration of West Papuans by Indonesian security forces.

After the students were detained last weekend, riots erupted in the cities of Manokwari and Jayapura. Thousands of people against the mistreatment of the students and, more broadly, the mistreatment of West Papuans by the Indonesian authorities. Many protesters waved the nationalist Morning Star flag, an act (Indonesia is not just sensitive about how West Papuans treat the Indonesian flag 鈥 the state prohibits them from flying their own.)

In response to the deteriorating security situation, Indonesia has to the region.

Protesters set fire to the local parliament building and cars in West Papua earlier this week. Sofwan Azhari/EPA

 

Widodo鈥檚 promises haven鈥檛 changed much

When the politically moderate Indonesian President Joko Widodo came to power in 2014, West Papua observers had he might broker peace in the region, much the same way the government of his predecessor, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, was able to .

However, Widodo has not been capable of controlling the Indonesian military in West Papua. He also doesn鈥檛 seem to realise that to ending the armed resistance in the region 鈥 West Papuan leaders want a political resolution, not an economic one.

Part of Widodo鈥檚 development agenda in West Papua has been to commence building a to facilitate movement of goods and people across the astoundingly rugged terrain in the region.

But in December, West Papuan guerrilla forces Indonesian workers constructing the highway, killing several dozen. There鈥檚 deep resentment among West Papuans toward Indonesian migrant workers, who they believe are taking their jobs and land and disrupting Papuan life in the region.

Violence by the Indonesian military and police against West Papuans has also increased during Widodo鈥檚 presidency. According to the International Coalition for Papua, a human rights organisation, were arrested for political activism in 2015 and 2016. The group has also documented more than 300 victims of torture or maltreatment and 20 victims of extra-judicial killings for those years.

In addition, local journalists continue to face harassment from security forces, while foreign journalists are still denied entry to West Papua. Preventable diseases and malnutrition have also had devastating effects throughout the region.

In 2017, Widodo 鈥 a process West Papuans had been requesting since at least 2008. However, the leaders of the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) it was too little, too late.

A new independence referendum

West Papuans are on independence from Indonesia.

In 1969, seven years after Indonesia invaded West Papua, in which West Papuans were to decide on independence or official integration with Indonesia. Indonesia handpicked less than 1% of the Papuan population to vote and .

The result has been a lengthy, often brutal colonial occupation of Papuans and their land.

Independence advocates have the support of at least 鈥 as well as a 鈥 as they pursue the possibility of a new referendum on decolonisation through the United Nations.

 

Through revived links with , as well as the mass connectivity afforded by social media, Papuans are enjoying levels of solidarity from around the world they have never before experienced.

While independence is still unlikely for West Papua, it would be foolish to rule it out. Timor Leste, South Sudan and Kosovo have shown us that right to self-determination is one that is still honoured, even if infrequently.

Why does West Papua matter?

Why should the world care about this little-known decolonisation movement?

The answer is simple: In the post-Rwandan genocide world, the international community has committed to a moral and political 鈥溾 people whose states are unable or unwilling to ensure them safety, or are perpetrating crimes against them.

 

The means that UN members are required, under international law, to protect anybody at risk of

"genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity."

It is time the world lives up to its responsibility to demand that state-sanctioned violence against West Papuans stop, no matter how bad relations with Jakarta become. Ultimately, lives are worth more than politics.The Conversation

, Lecturer,

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

UOW academics exercise academic freedom by providing expert commentary, opinion and analysis on a range of ongoing social issues and current affairs. This expert commentary reflects the views of those individual academics and does not necessarily reflect the views or policy positions of the 精东传媒 of 精东传媒.